Citizenship and Social Class
According to T.H. Marshal in order for any person or group
to achieve equal rights the judicial system must play a very important role,
they are the one main element needed for any one groups right to be enforced
and implemented. As per marshal equal rights is only achieved when any group or
person can execute political “power”, in other words to have a voice and a
vote. He also that in order for a group or individual to enjoy equal rights
they must be part of a major group and be participant of its legislations and
enjoy all benefits whether social economic and be able to enjoy the benefits of
being such a member.
Interestingly enough while T.H. Marshal was attempting to
trace back to see the birth of citizenship he broke citizenship down into three
major groups civil, political, and social. He attempted to show that civil
rights came first, then political, rights and later social. Marshal stated that social rights were
somewhat unaddressed until the development and implementation of public
education. It seems that T.H. Marshal uncovered that the social aspect of equality
was not advancing at the same rate as the civil and political aspect. It seems that
social equality was not being addressed with the same sense of urgency as were
the other two aspects.
According to T.H. Marshall Citizenship is a Status that is bestowed
upon members of society and whom enjoy the same status of equal rights and
duties as other members of this society. Meaning that Citizenship is a “guarantee”
that you will be treated equally as other members of your society and you have
the same obligations as other members.
According to Marshal there is no universal principle of what Citizenship
should look like but ideally citizenship should reflect
a measure of equality in which all Citizens enjoy the same privileges and responsibilities.
In a society of equal rights there should not be differences in the way an
individual is treated because of race, or gender. Unfortunately this sense of
equality does not carry over when it pertains to class equality. According to
Marshal Class equality is very similar to Citizenship as they are both based on
a set of values and ideals and as such may bring forth conflicts between
opposing principles. To my understanding class and Citizenship are both based
on principles that are imposed or implemented by those who have more power and
will be opposed by those who disagree. Citizenship should reflect the principles
of all its citizens and not just those who have power.
Citizenship at its earliest form was designed as a principle
of equality, however as is usually present when men attempt to empower
themselves over others equal rights take a back seat to the desires of others
to be in control. Capitalism was a conduit for separation of classes. As some
people began to accumulate fortunes and power separation of classes also grew
and this also led to separation of rights.
ReplyDeleteThe essay "“Citizenship and the Social Class” by T.H Marshall, he is breaking down citizenship into three parts providing the rights of citizenship. The first part of citizenship talks about how the individual is entitled to civil rights such as freedom of speech, education, protection, and civil rights laws.The second part, which is the political aspect of citizenship, talks about all citizens are able to vote. The third part, the social aspect of citizenship, Marshall believed every one in the social class would benefit from capitalism and everyone would be equal. Marshall wrote his essay during 1949 living in England. I believe Marshall's idea of citizenship status didn’t address racial discrimination. Marshall was focused more in the white working class and only viewed the problem through the society he was living in.